Turkey and the ECtHR: (In)effective Remedies from Strasbourg
Report of the Conference held on 5 March 2018
Table of contents
Conference sponsors
Conference programme
- Panelists
- Opening keynote and introduction
- Panel I: “Does the court provide an effective remedy to the citizens of turkey in applications concerning the events relating to the attempted coup and the subsequent declaration of a state of emergency?”
- Riza Türmen
- Michael o’Boyle
- Başak Çali
- Panel II: “Should the court adopt a different approach, and if so, what should it be?”
- Francoise Hampson
- Question and answers
- Question one: fulfilment of the exhaustion principle
- Question two: rule 39 interim measure applicability
- Question three: possibility of interstate cases particularly e.G. In relation to refugees
- Question four: turkish legal procedure
- Question five: turkish disregard of court judgements
- Question six: likelihood of interstate cases
- Question seven: pace and ngo mobilization
- Question eight: the ECTJR’s role in ongoing violations of human rights
- Question eight: foreign involvement and assistance
- Closing remarks: Tony Fisher
- Annex 1: postscript on the altan and alpay judgements